Next: 5. Kinetic energy matrix
Up: Localised spherical-wave basis set
Previous: 3. Fourier transform of
The overlap matrix for any two basis functions
and
centred at
and
respectively is
where
. The dummy variable of integration has been changed in
order to highlight the fact that
is a function of
only. Using a variant of the convolution
theorem and the fact that the basis functions are real enables the
integral to be rewritten as
|
(11) |
Using equation (9a) we obtain
|
(12) |
where
is the integral
|
(13) |
Introducing differential operators
, obtained from
by making the replacement
where
in Cartesian coordinates, equation
(13) becomes
|
(14) |
where we have used the fact that the integrand is an even function of
for all values of and to change the limits of the
integral. From equation (14)
no longer
appears manifestly symmetric with respect to swapping and
. Nonetheless, it still is because under the swap
,
and
.
The three spherical Bessel functions in equation (14)
can all be expressed in terms of trigonometric functions and algebraic
powers of the argument, using the recursion rules
(40,41, Appendix). The product of three
trigonometric functions can always be expressed as a sum of four
trigonometric functions with different arguments, using well-known
identities. The result is to split the integrand up into terms of the
following form:
These terms are individually singular and generally possess a pole of
order on the real axis at and cannot be
integrated. However, since we are integrating finite well-behaved
functions we know that the total integrand cannot contain any
non-integrable singularities. Therefore we can add extra contributions
to each term to cancel all the singularities except simple poles, and
all these extra terms must cancel when the terms are added together to
obtain the whole integrand.
We shall evaluate the integrals using the calculus of residues so
that the general integral to be performed is
|
(16) |
where
and the
contour runs along the real -axis from to ,
and is closed in either the upper or lower half -plane, depending
upon whether is positive or negative respectively. Adding the
extra terms to regularise the integral we obtain the final form of the
integral
|
(17) |
This integrand now has simple poles lying on the contour of
integration at
. The residues
of these poles are
Summing the residues to perform the Cauchy principal value integrals,
and taking real or imaginary parts as appropriate, we obtain the
following results:
where
|
(21) |
For the case when
, we note that since the
integrand in equation (17) must still only have a simple
pole at
we obtain a simplified form in this
special case by taking the limit
of equations (19,20).
The result for
is obtained by summing the results
in equations
(19,20,22,
23) for all the terms in the expansion of the
integrand (14) and then operating with the differential
operators
.
A second special case occurs when
,
and in this case it is simplest to perform the integral
(10) in real-space using the generalised orthogonality
relation for spherical Bessel functions (43) when
.
|
(24) |
There is also the case when
and
which is calculated using equation
(44, Appendix).
|
(25) |
Finally, it is obvious that the overlap matrix element must vanish
when the separation of the the sphere centres exceeds the sum of their
radii (i.e.
) because then
there is no region of space where both basis functions are
non-zero. However, this is not obvious from the results presented
above, but arises because of the change of sign of the residue sums in
equations
(19,20,22,
23) (denoted by
) which occurs when
and results in exact
cancellation of all terms.
Next: 5. Kinetic energy matrix
Up: Localised spherical-wave basis set
Previous: 3. Fourier transform of
Peter Haynes